If they fail to leave, evict based on the habitual lease violations.If you can't figure out how to do this, or don't feel comfortable doing it, then the other option is to allow them to finish their lease and then require them to move out when it ends.

This is due to the  increase in mortgage rates and house prices.Pros/cons as I see it:Pros: two appreciating assets versus one; as rents rise, we’ll make more net income.cons: less cash flow, double capex, double maintenance.Anyone mind letting me know your thoughts?

How did you end up in this situation?

This question is for the scenario of an owner of a property renting it to a wedding and event business that operates the venue, not a lease agreement for an individiual couple getting married.Thank you!

@Chris Berry - I wrote a blog on exactly this subject.  

Alongside this 5,000-square-foot Bird Streets home, buyers have the option to acquire three life-size Spider-Man figures signed by Lee.

So the total amount that should be paid will be rent for remaining days in month + security depositORrent for remaining days in month + next month + deposit - I don't know when would this situation arise.

I have read a lot about how the seller can do the closing on the sale himself, and save the buyer and himself a large fee.

Open to any other recommendations too.Thanks for reading!

Probably smart to take a break a couple of years of this market, I think you are coming back at exactly the right time - on the cusp of the next boom market