I would tell them no, simply because they were dishonest and didn't address this before closing.

Alot of contractors I see in my area have a tough time getting ahead simply because their not good at managing the business aspect of the business. 

But I'm using the current RE craze to exit all of my OOS properties as I've found that my multi-units within CA simply perform much better and have appreciated much more as well.

However, there is a caveat to this that most agents fail to either learn, be taught, or don't read the contract, or simply the case that it is not practiced in certain areas. 

My question is: what are pros and cons of doing so vs. simply blocking off those days?

However if the bank came and said we're going to call the note then what you simply do is transfer the asset back into your personal name and then it takes that due on sale clause you know it cures that provision right on the other hand if you're going to borrow money it's going to come from a soft hard money lender or a hard money lender in which case they're going to want you to put in an llc and they're going to lend to you based on the asset.

Unfortunately these articles are lacking real world examples of how the fees can transition into equity, or simply true examples of GP vs LP deal specifics.The articles speak to the 70/30 or 80/20 split of the cash flow after the 8% preferred but I'm more interested in how equity is split between GP and LP from the onsetMight anyone be able to share a few examples of how you have structured acquisition fees and management fees and equity through non tradition contribution?

There are simply too many homebuyers and investors all looking for the same thing (a well-priced home in a decent area that does not need too much work), and too few folks selling these homes.

Or simply easy of conversation?

If stuff is left in the home we simply trash it out after we have legal possession and get to the business of doing the tenant turn.