True, 10 or 15k could only solve deferred maintenance that adds no value on the upside, but applies on the down side to it's as is value.

I find I have moral issue with paying an industry to solve a problem that they created.

,Solve your problem easier.

I can tell you I know more about the Act than many lawmakers, I'm sure my congressman doesn't have a clue.

I agree with you Andrea,the problem is that I have no clue what's a deal and what isn't.

It is a shame everyone think they know how the DF will affect doing deals but law makers, lawyers don't have a clue about the law.

The reason no attorney wants it is probably because it would end up involving the attorney who claims she just sold a form, if she closed it there should have been some due diligence that the attorney didn't do or didn't have a clue about.I suggest she call an attorney from out of the area or out of state who can practice in here state, since 80K is at risk.If the mortgagee is willing to take back payments, bring it to date.

My profile of experiences is good for solving insomnia for many folks.

Here are my suggestions: hold off calling the professional community until you've got a few deals under your belt and have developed a level of confidence in your problem solving skills.

Answer all questions before signing on the line because disputes are easier to avoid than they are to solve.