
11 February 2016 | 24 replies
SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF PREMISES 600.5726 Recovery of possession following forfeiture of executory contract for purchase of premises; accelerated indebtedness.

30 October 2018 | 9 replies
Whatever you do, do not allow possession of any kind post-closing.

28 August 2016 | 22 replies
The judge will always award the possession order for non-payment here in chicago but getting them out after the possession order is what takes the most time.

19 May 2019 | 3 replies
Need to file Writ of Possession.

30 May 2017 | 53 replies
You can also check that tenants will remain in possession.

6 February 2017 | 5 replies
In a standard foreclosure case, you basically need to prepare and file writ of possession and other documents with the court.

1 February 2017 | 3 replies
Get the keys from the tenant take possession of your real estate.

23 January 2018 | 14 replies
.), before possession will be granted.

20 February 2021 | 84 replies
Toledo investors and landlords had our day in court today and really the day could not have gone better.We were awarded our preliminary injunction immediately stopping the enactment of the ordinance...we now have an absolute unequivocal ruling that the City of Toledo cannot carry forward with the threat to fine landlords who don't comply with their ordinance.This ruling is of course in advance of the Judge's final ruling on the case...for a permanent injunction of the entire ordinance.Of note - our esteemed Judge awarded our injunction citing validity OF ALL FOUR key justifications of the lawsuit:- The city of Toledo city council cannot hand over enforcement powers it doesn't possess as a legislative body (the cornerstone of unconstitutionality) over to the Lucas County Health Dept.- The city failed to have an agreement with the LCHD when they enacted the ordinance (they created one months later when we requested a copy for our lawsuit).- There is a violation of the equal protection of individuals (landlords) in enforcing this ordinance ONLY on owners 1-4 units and not on all rentals or all homes built before 1978.- The city fumbled the definition of Owner in their municipal code (we filed the issue in court about a week ago)...anyone who had a utility bill and controlled the property was considered an owner and thus exempt from the ordinance so totally muddying the waters two weeks before implementation was to occur.

6 January 2016 | 5 replies
Hopefully this will warn off any future landlords from allowing him to gain possession of their property.