Those arguing to just blow em off in 1 form or fashion, lol, well I am blunt and compulsively honest so I will just call it as I see it that they have no clue what there talking about, that's a fast-track to more problems. 

I would argue that as long as there is a shortage in inventory, the prices will continue to go up.

You argue that you - adhere to code, - via violating code. 

Even a second year law student would be able to successfully argue this case in court. 

To argue there is NO opportunity, or even little, is to argue things are "Perfection" or darn close to it.

If it was bought as rental from the beginning, your explanation is true.You are apparently not aware of the non-qualified use rule, so please do not argue.

If it has a NCF of $275/month ($3300/yr), that means after 5 years you will have paid an additional $16,500 for that property...and will have made no money.What I'm trying to argue is that even without perfectly CFing the property, I'd still end up ahead from an EQUITY perspective.

Affirmative:"Home owners will panic sell increasing inventory causing a "crash" because they think the bubble is going to burst"This isn't my personal prediction.  I'm not selling.  I can't help but wonder if the mark...

We all can do simply math and simple math says leverage increase returns no arguing that point.

The only exception would be the person that gets lucky, but using that metric you could argue that playing the lottery is a better method of gaining wealth.And if you think someone is going to answer this question to your satisfaction in a single thread, you're a fool.