Hello BPer's,This forum is filled with useful sales scripts and objection handling techniques.

I share past deals with investors, like to educate them first, understand investor objectives, are they accredited (a requirement for many syndications) and if they are informed, qualified and have capital will alert them to future deals.  

My main objection is: you're paying close to full market value.

One problem is I'm not exactly sure how to objectively describe "clean and safe".

Back in 2008, I had shiny object syndrome and bought a condo in downtown Chicago that definitely didn't meet this criteria even though it was a foreclosure.

If the owner passes they pass on it but at least you know you made an objective unemotional offer.

Thank you @Jd martin,My investments were made originally and continue to be based on cash flow and appreciation is a secondary objective.  

Now, if you were actually CLOSING every deal, and telling the sellers you intend to close, possibly do some repairs, and then resell they might not meet that idea with as much objection as if telling them you intend to make thousands of dollars by simply selling the contract.

It seems like the bank may have some objections to splitting it up in that case.Good question, though.

@David DachteraNot sure this is a legal question so much as experience with credit unions and their policies for removal of (nearly) duplicate objects for the same accounts.