One approach, which is admittedly only a small hedge, is to re-fi in the near future if you can get a fixed rate.

I can't say that approach doesn't work.

There are several approaches that may be taken as well, such as labor contributions by the buyer. 

With this approach, the internal opening can be found in 82.6% of cases.

I have approached a lot of sellers from my DM campaign about using seller financing and they are just not interested because they want to cash out.The Solution:So I want to engineer a double transaction where I get the seller to originate the note, and then take that note to a note buyer right after the closing so the seller can cash out and I get my seller financed note.

Bottom line is pick one; do it to the best of your ability; measure your results and then refine the approach or move on to a different method.

The challenge w/ this approach, if you're going to buy & hold, is your LLC will not be able to borrow any money.  

The goal of these standards is to ensure the regulatory approach keeps pace with the change in the market.

His thinking as to his goal of paying of other loans may not be the best approach as his payment now in an old loan are contributing more to principal reduction, his real interest expense is declining, even at a higher note rate his cost may be less.

I've been approached to purchase an off market 12 family apartment building in a popular Missouri vacation area.