Finding an overbuilt area with strong job growth in the forecast gets me all worked up.

Of course nowhere else in the country can you expect the equity growth that we have here in the SF Bay Area...I was just saying yesterday and one of my favorite and very appropriate phrases....."

I've just grown skeptical of the Fannie process so I've moved on to non-Fannie deals.I believe the Fannie deals are going at a premium to account for the special financing terms (lower LTV ratios and ability to finance more properties than the usual Fannie limit).

The idea here would be you get a master lease which gives you the ability to sub lease the units, obviously this needs to be at a rate less than market rental rate.

My biggest concern is what a first year agent can truly make.I know my ability and drive, but what I don't know is what the average income is for a new agent.

There has been a lot of growth in these areas so the appreciation aspect was attractive to me at first.

I established that goal prior to my knowledge of BP and the ability of investors to significantly speed up financial goals.

Originally posted by @John Chapman: @Greg Hall can you elaborate on why you think the "subject to" might impede the purchaser's ability to sue for specific performance?

It would be wise to screen and be confident in their ability and desire to pay rent to you.

Primarily I am concerned about if I choose to buy and hold, how do I predict an upward growth trajectory in regard to the construction quality and thus the "word around the campfire" about the subdivision.