what's technically correct and what's practical are differentYou shouldn't have let them pay for and install new toilets They shouldn't take the toilets with them, and if they do they should put the old ones back in but the reality is you're looking at ~$300 worth of materials and maybe a bit more after labor.

If your Victorian technically is a residential home at one time there may be a way around this, I’ll check with my residential lender tomorrow who’s a ninja when it comes to anything creative.

At least I couldn't think of a situation where this would apply.There are other technicalities, see article: 121 Exclusion rules The article goes into other special situations.

The second part of his reasoning was that since it is technically classified as an "investment property", the rate will naturally be higher than if I were buying a house as a primary residence (this I can understand).

Technically you could just get another FHA loan yourself should you move for a "legitimate" FHA approved reason.

No matter the outcome, I'm glad I looked and feel like it's progress in my investing journey (that hasn't technically begun yet).

I actually used my HELOC for the down payment, so technically I'm in with no money down. 

The most costly but less technical would be just closing out the plan.

I just don't see it as being as getting licensed here, then *hoping* I somehow get a good start out there without all the little insights the instructors may have, even though it would technically cost me less money. 

It is a duplex to technically it’s two units.