I have heard wonderful stories and big loss stories given the same circumstances.I am not certain Rob K is correct given the Kelo Supreme Court decision.Right after the Supreme Court made that ridiculous ruling, Michigan had a ballot proposal that passed by over 80% of the vote to restrict eminent domain.

An appraiser is bound by the zoning and building restrictions on a property as it applies to value.If you meet those criteria, then you are going to have a hard case for classifying the property as living area if you do not even have a bathroom.

I certainly feel that license fees and restrictions amount to a "tax" as well.

Deed restrictions are vague and it is outside the city limits.There is a mix of nice homes and okay homes built in the 80's--and one or two kind of shabby homes.

The self imposed social taxes of the most wealthy need to be trimmed, the donations made to charities and foundations, with more contributed to the national concerns.

Also, most short sales these days have resale restrictions of between 60 and 120 days, making it harder to wholesale.Not impossible, but definitely more difficult...

Calumet City (http://il.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20090217_0000172.NIL.htm/qx) whereby they stated that the inspection requirements and time frame are too long and thus restrict the owner's rights to sell the property.

Here is a question: Aren't the fair housing law restrictions only valid for those who own a certain minimum number of properties?

The biggest one will be "lender overlays" - rules that *arent* fha's that the bigger banks will impose.

There is no deed restriction per se arising out of your type of loan.Other lenders may have restrictions for your buyer to be financed prior to 90 days.