Forty of the roof airs were considered damaged and would be replaced. mgmt people convinced Lloyds of London that the interior exchanger was not compatible and insurance replaced both.

I live in Southern California.Is an HOA responsible for damages caused by it's contractors?

Find damages and instantly search for solution, handyman, tools & etc.As a calculator based on images making stimates and comparing with other properties with the same structure and all that stuffWhat about you?

There is a valuation process, it's that in residential deals it's too much brain damage, not that it's impossible to do, so 10% is viewed as a relevant option price, but it can be less, as to consideration, establishing an equitable interest and over a reasonable period of time, 3 to 5 years usually.

Didn't really think it would be worth the brain damage of paying the bill and collecting the money from the tenant but perhaps for large users it might be.

Essentially, I am saying it's a bunch of brain damage to have a "potential" value which frankly might not be so accurate based on time.

I also charge my tenants a $50 service call for repairs that as long as its not due to tenant damage gets refunded to them so I don't think I would have much of an issue with regards to unnecessary repair requests. 

If a dog damages the property or disturbs other tenants they should be financially responsible just like someone would have to install and then later remove their own grabs bars or accessible fixtures at their own cost (at least in CT).

In a very bad scenario, the structure is damaged, the land value is reduced (I heard that happened after one of the previous earthquakes here before) and there is still a mortgage payment every month with no rental income.

If you don't insulate the pipes for the tenant unit and there is a break and/or damage, it's not like you can charge the tenant for repairs.