@Jonathan R McLaughlin Thank you for such a detailed response, and very good point about the not apologizing aspect.

This information was helpful and I am looking into the details surrounding the refi.

Improperly uploaded my image in the original post - here is the detailed analysis!

Ask @Scott Smith for details on this and how this operation is called.

If anyone else is interested, comment below and I'll send over the details. 

We have payed 80%+ of the balance, but he is fighting that we need to pay the full initial rate that we signed on even though the details of the contract are inaccurate and he never sent any written Addendum to the contract for changes in work (he just went ahead and made the executive decision about adjustments without checking with us first).

@Wayne Brooks  without knowing details who knows whats happening.. but usually you have affirmative coverage or you have an act that your accused of that is not covered.. that as you state could be the case here.. 

You can see where this is going I assume.Reasonably I would assume (see the word assume and know that it makes an *** out of u and me) that any judge or arbitration would side on the fact that "three times" would refer to three individual times spending the night.Reality is the contract is poorly written, or perhaps you have not given enough detail since you didn't want to get into the weeds here, and is illegal given the way it is written. 

Even without LLC, you can still deduct above items.  

This will be on September 19th starting at 10 AM.Willing to speak more on details if interested.