data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc549/bc549afd14ad5694bdcf2e4b714654860d2568dc" alt=""
15 January 2018 | 4 replies
My assumption is, unless you have him already, contractors are not usually willing to jump from their jobs to go quote projects they won't be getting.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef361/ef36130bae12e0d5f39857258f3261f83ef8aa21" alt=""
10 January 2018 | 6 replies
After that the real estate market follows, but much slower.The net effect is that the down payment you are sitting on now invested in stocks and mutual funds takes a bigger hit than the reduction in RE values, making it much harder to buy the same property you could have bought today.There are a lot of assumptions baked into that statement, like that you have a chunk of change in the stock market, or that you even have a sizeable down payment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8662/f866293132492078f35281237f8ec89196ce2393" alt=""
14 January 2018 | 11 replies
Now, the core of your question relies on the assumption that your contractor is out to take advantage of you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a0c0/3a0c0e487bb0427d0c2f51d231ddd7c43b45a1fa" alt=""
15 January 2018 | 9 replies
So basically I'm going over what he sent me, I started analyzing the Schedule E that has my 3 rentals and noticed the total expenses are WAY lower than what I gave him on my reports, so below I give you the example of one of the rentals (all 3 have the same characteristic, my accountant has expenses WAY lower than what I sent him on my report):House 1 - long term rental - Schedule E (house bought in 12/2013) Income: $9,346 Expenses declared by accountant: $9,992 (this is what he somehow figured out) Now on the report that I gave him my total expenses are $30,300 (repairs $11,792, supplies $8,329, the rest were renovations and other stuff), so there was a lot of work on this property.I asked him why the difference and his response was:"I made some assumptions in the earlier years about capitalizing costs vs. repair costs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d588c/d588c881dd68da64dfc8c822aefb83d17ca92bca" alt=""
28 January 2018 | 6 replies
@Ryan Johnston Network as hard as possible and do not make any of the assumptions on estimates on cost that you made in Chicago.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c25d3/c25d3dae0a9e6ed7c66fb5caeb7ba398190a1057" alt=""
14 January 2018 | 4 replies
@Roshan Taheri If rental real estate income does in fact qualify for the pass-through deduction -- and there is no chapter and verse on that although most practitioners are operating under the assumption that it does -- you will get the deduction regardless of whether you hold it in your name or through an LLC (as long as the LLC has not elected to be taxed as a C corporation).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b180/0b180afc3c3ab3db3379187b21b61c10cb96549f" alt=""
14 January 2018 | 6 replies
I try to make a fair set of assumptions and figure something that would work for both of us.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7587b/7587b8d8ca0af8b4b9056ce4f19568b3d9808fb9" alt=""
14 January 2018 | 2 replies
Your assumption is also correct where you are better off finding a property that has value-add such as Rehab and increase in rent- as a Rehab will lead to lower maintenance and capex costs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/789a4/789a47a846640e7b8b7ece8db80ecde0b20c5ff6" alt=""
14 January 2018 | 2 replies
It also makes property Tax and Insurance assumptions, thus "PITI" payments.