Is that the main goal or something else?

I mainly bought it for the land, do not intend to rent it out for cash flow or what not.It is currently occupied by the previous owner.

I am not even stating your deceptive post was intentional but with you not owning up to the expenses that were not included, I am starting to question if for some reason you intentionally posted numbers that did not depict all expenses.I want people to post corrections to such erroneous posts with so that newbies do not see similar numbers and think that the referenced property is good cash flow.  

Here are 5 reasons why taking part of a good deal is ALWAYS better than 100% of no deal.1.

It is one of the reasons I like a Wrap Note and Mortgage (or Deed of Trust). 

To determine what to offer on a rental property:Determine reasonable market rent, NOT the highest!

of the "great photo" examples having calendars that are wiiiiiiide open, with barely a booking on them.Fair enough, I pulled these from first page results of nation wide searches (it was skewed SE for me because I mainly look in those areas) so they obviously rank very high on the algorithm.

For the reasons other have said, do your best to keep the rental. 

For the moment though, I am just trying to gain a more robust understanding of all things real estate that I could reasonably see in my future.  

If mass deportations were to actually happen, it could slightly ease demand, mainly in larger cities, but probably not enough to change rent rates.