The paintball could access from one side, leaving the rented side access without risk of being shot with paintballs.

Or in this case may save your hard earned principal you'll be putting at risk!

I have bought off market properties without being able to get inside but they were condo's so there was minimal risk.

Buying a one door house is way too expensive and you have to take on high insurance, plus cleanup risk after a hurricane (still shook from Irma).

Adding to what @Sam Shueh said, there are also insurances, Builder's Risk and Flood.

There is just so much risk to have your inspector and rehabber to collude together.

Obviously in terms of risk profile leasing to a marijuana tenant ranks relatively high, but is it any worse than the liability exposure if you have a tenant polluting your property for example? 

PM) network- Risk toleranceand so on.And there are those that avoid residential like a bad cold and stay strictly office / retail.It can all work and it can all go horribly wrong.

With the risk of oversimplifying, the underwriters set the "global" rule.

So I am confident that this is an option (but am open to feedback confirming or rebutting).First question: Is this something I really want to do (from a risk/exposure perspective)?