Argue!!!!!

So instead of A - B then B to C...it becomes A -BC.2) If #1 is feasible (meaning you can add your name to the purchase contract of B), then do a quit claim deed from B to C.

Many would argue that it is not within the top 40 of the 52. 

One blog from a law firm argues an interesting theory of what ifs: What if the endorser is not qualified to endorse it say "a rubber stamp" or "a clerk" not qualified to enter into contracts (ie no authorization to sign in behalf of corporation) or simply cross out all the words (this, i find it VERY interesting).Since I could potentially get both -- pay short and get paid short --, I was looking for a way to cover all bases.I guess the class billion years ago could potentially beat a 700 year old law lol.It was an interesting topic though.

@David Green yes, this is common.If the repair will take extra long, 90-120 days, you may be able to argue that you could have placed a tenant during the time it is down durning repair.  

Redmond had no issues bringing in lots of land that has subsequently gone up for development or is awaiting master planning.I think this subject is a hot topic that you and I may disagree with on some levels and am not sure that this is the forum to argue the merits of the "draconian" legislation, that we both agree is fundamentally flawed and needs changes.

“Having determined that the Code is not saved by special needs or the closely regulated industry exceptions, the Court concludes that the Code’s failure to include a warrant provision violates the Fourth Amendment.”Take a second and thank 1851 Center for Constitutional law–the non-profit that argued this case–with a contributions from folks just like you.

Hop into the nearest ABC Store (convenience store, not liquor) and grab a book: "The Big Island Revealed" and it's perfect for finding all the cheap hidden gems.

I had hoped that there might be a way to argue for such an exception.

You could perhaps argue that keeping stolen property on the premises is a violation of law even though your tenant was not aware of it.