Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

443
Posts
150
Votes
Karin Crompton
  • Rehabber
  • Niantic, CT
150
Votes |
443
Posts

Double-Closing Technicalities (i.e. my atty says my way is illegal!)

Karin Crompton
  • Rehabber
  • Niantic, CT
Posted

Hey all,

I'm having a bit of trouble sorting out how to complete a double closing here in CT. To attempt to summarize, my attorney tells me we can't fund the A-B with the B-C money. We are using a hard-money lender (HML) in this situation. I should add that the contract cannot be assigned, so the A-B does need to take place and can't be A-C.

I believe my attorney's primary issue is that we can't do B to C funding as a first step b/c we don't actually own anything at that point. Also, that that money can't be used for the A to B transaction b/c our lender has not agreed to loan to the wholesaler, only to loan to us.

We've done this a couple of times in the past in cash transactions where we brought the cash. It was clunky. Our attorney drafted a note saying we were making an unsecured loan to the wholesaler; we did A to B that way, and then the funds were immediately paid back when we did the B to C closing 10 minutes later.

This time we've got the hard-money lender. I haven't yet contacted them, but I imagine they've been in this situation before and am hopeful they will have an easy solution (probably at a price). After all, we have an agreement w/the wholesaler and the HML has agreed to fund us. All we need to do is smooth over the first part - the wholesaler buying from the seller - that has my attorney hung up.

I understand the laws vary by state, but is there something I'm missing? I swear I've heard other investors in CT talk about doing double closings all the time, though I've never gotten the nitty-gritty details. Maybe it's always this clunky.

Any suggestions?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

23,418
Posts
13,508
Votes
Wayne Brooks#1 Foreclosures Contributor
  • Real Estate Professional
  • West Palm Beach, FL
13,508
Votes |
23,418
Posts
Wayne Brooks#1 Foreclosures Contributor
  • Real Estate Professional
  • West Palm Beach, FL
Replied

Your best bet for some transactional type of funding should be your HML. His money will already be there anyway. The wholesaler should have figured this out. Another point with transactional funding...make sure that "B" has no judgment outstanding. If he does, they attach to that property during the 10 minutes he owns it.

Loading replies...