data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd16/2bd16f84f4098eb9d384e75f7a6b7efd168ea622" alt=""
9 October 2006 | 12 replies
I have done a lot of them, and would equate the extra work to doing an REO because there is a lot of paperwork, and phone calls with the lender involved, and in addition to that most of them require a lot of repairs, as these are already in foreclosure, and most of the time the owners have pretty much trashed the place, and it is a piled up filthy mess!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67420/674206791fe589715713e1926bcaf356c68ee495" alt=""
11 April 2014 | 8 replies
you use Excel to make the hard copy, but do you use it for automating your equations?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce8b9/ce8b9b51ccc4c88acd47b42194c5f752c05bab5d" alt=""
3 May 2007 | 16 replies
What the heck does that equate to.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8b2d/c8b2d30852e15363496179479787c45291e566b4" alt=""
2 April 2007 | 31 replies
However, rent is one factor of the whole equation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f3/c77f331ceeabf4dd3faf53da1c1574b749af9248" alt=""
11 January 2007 | 7 replies
always remember that those type of equations are rule of thumb to get u in the general $ amount.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c77f3/c77f331ceeabf4dd3faf53da1c1574b749af9248" alt=""
7 February 2007 | 6 replies
Like when the lawyer does the "adjustments" crediting each party for this and that in order to balance the equation, they'll find that there's an additional 10% which will go to you in the form of cash.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/029de/029defcaf6c95751f274e4b5a264a5b632ead2c9" alt=""
28 February 2007 | 7 replies
The risk is the part of the equation you left out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5709/b57094da17addf6e20c46b468db0d200ff378941" alt=""
26 February 2007 | 11 replies
Your attire does not equate experience or at a minimum, knowledge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff52c/ff52cd955a2d38d8d49b62cd06b064bb3611dbc3" alt=""
6 March 2007 | 12 replies
Just looking at that it doesn't look like it makes a lot of sense however I don't currently have any real tax deductions so looking at an amortization schedule I can reduce my taxable income by over 21k the first year which should equate to an additional 6k in my pocket, obviously this number will go down over time.