After reading the Occupants from Hell thread, I would approach a situation like this with extreme caution.  

OK, last week I found a house that looked good, but was listed as " Non-Profit", so I could not bid.This week it goes to " Owner Occupant" so I could bid, ( as an Invester)but if somone that wanted to live in the house , bid lower ,would still get the house.Next week ,or so it should go to " any and all bids" if it were still avalable.and the highest bidder would get the house as long as the bid was high enough for them to accept it.

I would focus on occupancy instead of weather.

I think he's saying that houses that are fixed up to be sold to owner occupants are getting turned into rental units because the owners can't sell them.

Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal. 9. 21 radio stations in L.

They allow a non-occupant co-borrower.

.• Occupancy scheduled for 2010Any more thoughts?

Most common example: Every single conventional 80% LTV 3-4 unit property loan I do for an owner occupant - all Freddie Mac, because Fannie wants 75% LTV in that scenario. 

Your best price will be form owner occupants, not investors, and your likely highest net price will be if you list it in the MLS with an agent.

So I'm in the process of getting a property manager and and I asked them the average length of occupancy by tennant and they told me 20 months.