When a tenant causes damages or leaves the place dirty, charge them for the cost of returning the property to its original condition, minus ordinary wear-and-tear.

The turn over rate is slower so not so much wear and tear on our sheets.  

Because it is a lease with the US Army Corps of Engineers, we are required to have the Lessor utilize our lease (a DRAFT copy has been attached for your review) and the 2 major differences in our lease are: #1 in lieu of a security deposit we offer a "Restoration/Repair Clause" that states any damages, above normal wear and tear, caused by the family will be paid for by the US Army Corps of Engineers.

A MF will likely see more wear and tear, and could see greater average vacancy (although less risk of 100% vacancy) than a SF. 

Hi Bailey,You're really tearing it up.It looks like a critical part of your success came from buying the 6 units while still in school.That's 20% down x 6 = 120% of the cost of house in cash (while in school).That's an impressive amount for a college kid to come up with so quickly?

While I talked to them they bounced from tears to panic.

I will check my lease and see if it specifies, although I would think that if it is not due to “normal wear and tear” that it would be the tenant’s responsibility.

Normal wear and tear or misuse?

I am also looking for excess wear and tear.Any excess wear and tear is something I am just taking note of.

Normal wear and tear i have issues with.