But when a contractor sees the value of a property being increased by $20,000 and then bidding the job based on that figure, like at $18,000, that's unethical as they are attempting to take the value increase that is due the owner.

But after several failed "attempts" to mail, I figured he was lying.

I don't know about "access" but I believe they must respond to a "pay off request" from a current owner, or title co. attempting to perform a closing.

Most suppliers attempt to attract new business with price but the intangable has a very high value.

I'm actually insulted by those with lesser experience and knowledge when they attempt to call me out on some minor issue.

I run into road blocks regularly with me living in CA and attempting to finance in Ohio.

Flower it up any way we want to, a lender who receives any type of collateral after any attempt to sell for amounts due never has the bundle of rights of ownership of the borrower/owner as those rights were never granted, only a security interest was granted.

With the lack of an Assumption Clause, you can still attempt to put a Subject To deal together.

I am looking into purchasing a few NPN seconds with the intention of attempting to get them re-performing or offer a reduced payoff to settle.

I've had a couple of unsuccessful bid attempts in BG.