
13 May 2015 | 16 replies
We agreed his contribution would be in part financial and to be responsible for taking lead on coordinating & executing the remodeling/renovation work required to flip properties.When we first discussed getting into business together, we attempted to weigh our % split based on the contributions that were being brought to the table.

23 February 2016 | 24 replies
That being said, if you want to do the test campaign of 100 letters/postcards (which is a good way to get your feet wet) and if you're expecting to see ANY kind of tangible, meaningful response from it, the quality of the copy and especially the quality of your list (along with how well you've filtered through the data) can and will have a major impact on your response rate.Yes - you can send out a direct mail campaign "just for kicks", but if you aren't taking the right specific actions along the way, you're going to be disappointed in your response rate, which will only deter you from taking further action (because you'll have the wrong idea from the beginning about the effectiveness of direct mail as a marketing tool).
30 September 2015 | 9 replies
I look forward to your contributions.

9 October 2015 | 5 replies
Hopefully I can help contribute more to the Canadian RE section of the forum.Ready for an exciting journey!

10 October 2015 | 8 replies
If it were my deal and I wanted it I would figure that he should contribute what the regular finders fee would be plus if he is going to manage the property he would get an additional managment fee of 10%.

30 September 2015 | 3 replies
My advice (almost always) is that if you are contributing financially to the property you should be on the title.

1 October 2015 | 29 replies
I have a long way to go and a lot to learn but at the minimum I felt like it was time to network and contribute on the BP site.

22 December 2015 | 14 replies
I recently found out how contributions work for a solo 401k and that rental income is passive.

1 November 2015 | 3 replies
“Having determined that the Code is not saved by special needs or the closely regulated industry exceptions, the Court concludes that the Code’s failure to include a warrant provision violates the Fourth Amendment.”Take a second and thank 1851 Center for Constitutional law–the non-profit that argued this case–with a contributions from folks just like you.

8 October 2015 | 44 replies
Account Closedundefined also contributed without looking for anything in return.