
19 June 2012 | 34 replies
Certainly, most people in this country lost a lot during that time, but among the "average Joe," there were fewer capital assets owned and therefore less of a proportionate drop (though if your sole asset was your primary residence, you probably lost a lot as well).Then, during the period from 2009-2012, if you were rich, you likely had some opportunities that were pretty unique in an historical sense -- real estate was as discounted as its ever been, taxes were low, fear was rampant, government policy favored them, etc.

26 January 2014 | 14 replies
I am working on the same assumption, I am certainly not willing to place my future on the government, I choose to take charge as most of us RE investors are doing.

12 November 2008 | 3 replies
Prospective home buyers would get a simpler way to understand often-confusing mortgage terms under new rules issued Wednesday by the federal government."

28 January 2009 | 19 replies
The government will make sure that it is still on the market completely renovated Jan. 1, right?

15 January 2009 | 8 replies
They're threatening their own credibility more than Dan Rather.

27 January 2009 | 14 replies
And since neither we nor anyone in the government actually has a grasp on these numbers it is just going to continue.

26 June 2016 | 4 replies
Renting someone's established list that is all opt in and credible and not just to send properties but to give an offer that someone would opt into.

27 June 2016 | 29 replies
To me, it seemed as credible as you can get.

6 July 2016 | 23 replies
But, government programs are running out of money.

1 June 2020 | 18 replies
Rule: Consumer debts are personal debts as opposed to business or government debts.Analysis: Residential mortgages are personal debts.