Stay with the deal or jeopardize losing the property (whatever makes most sense In your situation).

(Which never stopped any non-attorney investor from chiming in.)But I have heard numerous attorneys debate this issue to death, and I only learned one thing: two attorneys will NEVER agree on liability protection in general and on effectiveness of LLCs in particular.

She's been there for 4 years, maybe she'll be alright and stay 4 more. 

What is in the unit when I purchase it stays, but if it breaks I don’t replace it.

Stay in your job if that is what you want, but quitting your job in a relatively short period of time is possible. 

Sometimes it's ambiguous, but even then, why should I bother with the company that has numerous unresolved lawsuits, versus another company that is virtually the same but has none.

My stance would be to stay with the current PMs policy.

There was dead air space at the front due to no foundation ventilation.Damage- the front sill and sub floor, the center beam, damage under some old plumbing at the rear center; tube scarring on numerous floor joists.

And then, you'd also want to stay diversified.

I may not get this property but any information will be helpful in determining potential properties to go after or stay away from in the future.Thanks