.: •Curbio develops a strong reputation for quality and efficiency•Homeowners are attracted to Curbio’s ability to get things done efficiently, reliably and cost-effectively (no nightmare renos that go on forever)•Curbio continues to enlist realtors as strategic sales partners, by devising a referral commission program for them, to mitigate channel conflict•Curbio maintains sufficient decision-making control (e.g. project types; material & appliance options)•Homeowners are given sufficient preference choices within strict guidelines (e.g. color palettes; good-better-best options materials)But I suspect one of these two growth scenarios for Curbio might happen beforehand:•Expand current offerings to owners of rental properties•License technical infrastructure and processes to qualified contractors

And it technically does not matter if the other tenants complain or not..... 

technically it happens all the time, but real estate is less liquid thus its more obvious. ever try and buy a stock at a specific price and that price is no longer valid because the price changed.

It is "technically" simple to transfer title to a property, all you need is a properly drafted deed, signed, notarized, and recorded.  

With an agreement: the Buyer is your client and the seller is the client of the listing agent , hence they do not technically owe you a commission.   

Technically true and if you are looking short term then you can not bank on it.

It's not technically investing but it can help you increase your savings.

If all 3 units are roughly the same value, then you are only getting 1/3 of the total potential benefit.There's a lot of technicalities I'm intentionally skipping here, to distill the core issue. 

If there are any interruptions or technical difficulties, tenants will likely contact you for help, adding more work for you.

Being on title protects the seller from the buyer defaulting - it seems this is an alternative to "officially" putting them in a 2nd position)-- Title company sends seller the $350K they require-- Title company sends buyer back $650K (which they can use to pay off their transactional lender if they used one)So now the seller is happy bc they got the $350K they needed, the buyer is happy bc they acquired a property for zero dollars out-of-pocket, and from what I understand the 1st position lender is happy bc due the LLC arrangement the seller finance component is not technically considered a second lien on the property.