Once we start talking about bigger pieces of land that that woulud appear to developers (i.e. homebuilders or developers who do self storage, medical office, industrial, retail/commercial) then I usually can market to them without necessarily having to put on the market, because I know who the players are in SoCal, and that helps especially when seller doesn't want to do an exclusive listing, but will let you bring offers off market.But in general, for random pieces of land that aren't necessarily for the big developers/builders, you certainly need to put it on the market. 

I have been an exclusive investor agent for the last decade, usually representing landlords preferably. 

Enroll by 12/31/23 and you'll receive special bonuses, including exclusive content to apply what you learn in 2024 and an opportunity to win a 1:1 coaching call with your instructor.

We're currently in California and invest exclusively out of state in the Midwest.Happy to connect and share all the failures success tips tricks and tools if you're interested.Reach out connect and DM.

We exclusively work with contractors that come recommended from other investors.

@Theresa Harris the ruling require exclusivity to the listing agent’s listings… one just becomes a client of the agent, who you happen to meet at one of their listings.  

One of the brokers said he could send me dealflow but required that I sign a non exclusive representation agreement.

It doesn’t need to be an exclusive one or the other.

B-lenders are somewhere in between A-lenders (banks) and private lenders, and many also work exclusively with mortgage agents.

As Bill said, you'd technically need to remit market interest of ~5-6% to avoid a related party transaction, but since $100-120 would be vastly below their annual exclusion amount, you can just say that any interest that would otherwise normally accrue would be considered a gift to you.