If that's the case, it isn't relevant to the new landlords on this forum, unless they are starting with hundreds of units.Wait a sec, Mike...I hate to use logic in a debate, but...You said in an earlier post that the more units owned, the *more* likely the trends would be towards the average.Above you say that the more units owned, the *less* likely the trends would be towards the average.Yes, I realize you were speaking of two different phenomena (law of large numbers vs economies of scale), but you can't argue both sides in the same argument, which you clearly are.So, which is it?

I am also debating about putting purgo wood floors in some units.

I've been debating this myself the past few weeks.

I'll see you at the debates, bitches.

My intention is not to venture in to that debate again here - rather to understand if one needs to look elsewhere to see all REOs in our general geographical area or if they can all be found on the local MLS.

We need serious debate over this issue, before we hand over 700 billion dollars of our money.This reminds me of the Patriot Act.

Well, then you are probably upside down on all of them.If you are concerned about your FICO, anything less than a full 100% payoff or keeping the payments current until the market turns around is going to hurt.Many will debate the degree of the pain but at this point, there is not much point to it.

I was just wondering how the loss of jobs and the reverse of people back across the border would effect the housing markets in those states with a heavy immigrant pop.Remember when the whole debate about illegals not being required to have ss numbers to buy a house was going on?

My do we need to select one Rep and one Dem to square off in the debate?

Chat with you soon.....gonna go watch the debate.