I suppose the lender could utilize dutch auction provisions or whatever is specified in the agreements to liquidate the shares or ask the sponsor to make a market with the shares, but what incentive does the sponsor really have to do this to convince a lender to accept the illiquid collateral as valuable for your loan?  

Well, three years in I realized that it's a system that is very hard to change and my little body can't do much to radically reshape a poor setup system that only hurts those that it is supposed to help.

They are supposed to be great in the smaller markets I am not sure how they are for bigger complexes.  

I suppose it must have been procedural.

As per the lease, they were supposed to pay and use the home until the end of lease or notify us in advance.

It's ok to back out of the deal if it's falling apart and the seller is not meeting the contingencies.I had a situation where I was supposed to close on a Friday.

I supposed I should not have said lease "obviously beginning Aug 1" in my OP, I mean't Aug 1 or after. 

"Go Big or Go Home" Charles heheI've done enough due diligence on them and feel comfortable with the riskI also don't muck around with diversification within an investment vehicleI prefer diversifying between industries Had dinner with a hedge fund manager ($500m under management) a few weeks agoRumor is that Overstock is a $150+ stockKeyword is "Medici Ventures"Wall Street still cant value crypto income but supposedly these guys are making bank through tZEROLet me know your thoughts and I'll throw some $$$ at them ;)Grazie Mile

If the sponsor is the one who was supposed to sign for the loan but they cannot how does the contract still come together as me being a sponsor?

I suppose you consider yourself Christian too.