data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5e6c/e5e6c2a02e5eef3fd98de9abe4cfc59337cf415d" alt=""
7 June 2013 | 14 replies
Initially, it's more important for newbies, unfamiliar with business requirements to consider taxes at a lower initial or beginning level, access with cash flow, ease of maintenance of records, tax filings, legal work and administrative filings and duies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edaeb/edaeb87e660f67648219d1337abd15a2e9a25303" alt=""
11 June 2013 | 28 replies
Most Tax Attorney's only know the legal matters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ff66/5ff666da0ff790fadb59ef5daffb1fa748777346" alt=""
5 May 2015 | 52 replies
Out of that $540 you're paying:TaxesInsuranceUtilities (at least when vacant)Legal costsCPA costs (or, higher taxes if you try to DIY your taxes)Vacancy (even if just for a week or two during turnovers)Routine maintenance (inevitable, stuff really does break)Make ready costsTenant damage in excess of security depositsCapitalThe 50% number is well supported by large data sets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2817/d2817e0b0bd870f3756200f0d284d6aae7c28855" alt=""
30 June 2013 | 15 replies
If I remember correctly, this contradicts what I learned in my real estate classes -- while an unrecorded deed may not protect against third-party claims, the deed itself still defines a legal conveyance of title/ownership.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc30b/fc30b149b3f50125007b0ddf1edc4e98fa9600ec" alt=""
4 June 2013 | 9 replies
Make the end buyer feel as though if he screws you over, he may make an extra $20k but he'll lose ALOT more because 1) the pipeline of great deals you were going to plug him into just closed and 2) you know enough serious wholesalers out there that once he rips you off, all other wholesalers will know he's a crook as well.Again it's more of an 'attitude' than it is a 'legal' thing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41ebd/41ebd95fdfc0ef5cc4a3fd0d35a30c46bed0991d" alt=""
4 June 2013 | 5 replies
First, make sure a business can legally operate in the shop building.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7cfb4/7cfb42533f9f43deca4f7d233c17a673f60591a9" alt=""
8 June 2013 | 21 replies
When the buyer has to buy, it has to appraise, setting the price where they don't create any equity based on a future appraisal is predatory, putting the buyer in a position where they can not succeed under the terms set, being predatory, besides having legal issues, such is unethical, not really dealing in good faith.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fcf0/2fcf04110506908ef8a7c46d5c60fa83a067202c" alt=""
15 July 2014 | 15 replies
See, that's the thing, if it's legal here in Wisconsin.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52a91/52a91eba66b6f51c8147aa6733adbe1144daba28" alt=""
6 June 2013 | 7 replies
See also:http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/consideration-every-contract-needs-33361.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11219/1121963a30dbb74cce07a331b97ee9440c11ec6f" alt=""
27 July 2014 | 6 replies
Whether that will be good for you or not will depend on many things: what happens when a major repair is needed ("reserve funds"), who will do showing and screening when there is a vacancy, banking, tax bills, accounting matters, legal matters ...Better to be informed on those sorts of matters before getting into any more shared ownership IMO.