You went through the effort of itemizing the needed repairs, I would't expect anyone to do a take-off for you on this extensive list.

That is how I am pushing the conversation, but I am not sure what is going to happen.The dilution argument is very valid though and it isn't really something I considered.

And the converse would be true as well.The lender won't even know our purchase cost or rehab expenses.

If one of my direct buys from the asset manager, I either take it or I don't, no contingencies.One thing to note: Almost all the banks have their own addendums and in them, they have pre-set items in them.

Linkedin didn't get much play in any of the conversation.2.

There could be a myriad of reasons for this including a temporary spike in demand or conversely a drop in demand.

This is important because the depth of frost penetration may or may not be an item of concern when determining the repair type (depth of repair, etc).

Based on the numbers you provided, an all-in cost (acquisition of $50k plus rehab of $22k) is $72k which is 58% of the ARV (the low end you stated) which makes for an extremely good deal if the numbers are what you stated.I would also add that $22k for the work you mentioned seems low to me unless you are working with very low end items.

Waiting until the end of the year to consider any tax consequences can be a huge mistake especially if you are buying and selling property, do a 1031 exchange, have involuntary conversions, or need to make any major expenditures.

Does tenant pay for it all including hvac and capx or are those two items + anything else "major", the landlords responsibility?