Your analogy would be better suited if I were selling shares of my company's stock to new shareholders in return for half of the dividends and capital appreciation on their holdings over time.

Are they gonna be shareholders of the property?

Are they gonna be shareholders of the property?

Shareholders aghast: mandated policy violated!"

We understand that when a company goes public that its shareholders/bond holders are going to demand a certain rate of return on their investment over time.  

A shareholder must charge at least he Applicable Federal Rate as set forth by the Treasury when making a shareholder loan.

You have a good bit of flexibility to declare shareholder dividends (some of which will go tax-sheltered to the 401(K) owned shares) and also to make new 401(k) contributions and reduce your taxable income as a result.  

My wife is a 45% shareholder in that.

This is most likely territory for tax experts only but I'm wondering if anybody on BP has ever tried to structure something along these lines:Assume there is a closely held C-corporation that is doing relatively well and a shareholder would like to come up with money for a down payment on a multi-family property.

A backup administrator is attempting to get shareholder approval to take control of the investments.