![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1722567/small_1621515039-avatar-davidym.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 December 2021 | 3 replies
It leaves a lot of room for interpretation.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/632609/small_1645297256-avatar-gregr60.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
28 November 2021 | 14 replies
He's only looking at my 2019 & 2020 tax returns and is evaluating everything through that lens and his interpretation of my taxes.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1048655/small_1621508075-avatar-douglasg28.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 December 2021 | 12 replies
Originally posted by @Douglas Gratz:@Jay Hinrichs can you elaborate a little, by what you mean "if county/city code precludes it then in my mind deal is dead"It depends on All of the Exact language in your contract….which might be interpreted differently by you and the buyer….hence, enter the attorneys.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2193198/small_1625798041-avatar-jasonw673.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 December 2021 | 15 replies
I am not sure how to interpret the Freddie Mac guidelines from a legal standpoint, I can only tell you what my lender told me.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1882940/small_1631322921-avatar-christopherfabi.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
16 December 2021 | 8 replies
Too many judges are interpreting the rules when the rules are new so it is better to have a lawyer help you through this.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2144202/small_1694939543-avatar-kevingarabedian.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 November 2021 | 22 replies
MA is a particularly complex state and court interpretations of foreclosure statutes evolve.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/69584/small_1621414256-avatar-dghprops.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
22 October 2021 | 26 replies
Punchline: your interpretation is legally wrong and morally stupid.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2201396/small_1626669974-avatar-amandat85.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 October 2021 | 5 replies
Those are other questions : ) But I would agree with your interpretation.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2177585/small_1695214625-avatar-photogirl.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 November 2021 | 1 reply
I have tried to read and interpret the laws concerning using bandit signs and the only thing I can tell for sure, is of course, you can not put them on the highways.Can anyone explain if and where it is legal in Wisconsin, Dane county to put bandit signs?
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/273394/small_1694646632-avatar-mfinley919.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
26 October 2021 | 0 replies
Checking the credit of a prospective tenant is not an unfair housing practice if the landlord checks the credit of every prospective tenant.I'm confused on how the wording is to be interpreted for "The restrictions do not apply to a landlord with 3 or fewer rental units.