We have a small book that we created that goes along with our listing presentation, and preempts a lot of the sellers' concerns and objections not only in the listing presentation itself but for the process.  

If they do object, I would have your attorney threaten to delay closing (which no seller wants to do at this stage).

@Josh Heenan If you're objective is long term buy and hold which I'm presuming it is, I always recommend markets with strong economic and demographic trends.

.), but without any objective information, it is hard to evaluate which companies are solid performers. 

Objections from your investors?

After all, that is the objective - to solve the problem.Just the rambling opinions of a non-attorney.

Ultimately, I decided on Jacksonville because my primary objective is cash flow.

Didn't know their names and no way will my seller reveal any material information.Action points:1) I attempted to sign my own version of lease with same rates and maturity dates (but with my standard terms, conditions, and rules and regulations) --> one without issue and the other opposes.2) For the other, I have to (even very one-off) amend the contract to remove clauses that the tenant objects (immaterial items to me, so at least it's better than the "inherited" contract")Similar to your situation, I can't assume it's a problem tenant either.  

So no good options and potentially an expensive lesson...I haven't been in this particular situation before but I have had expensive lessons in Baltimore and my main in advice is remove emotion and look at this as objectively as possible.

If a long term goal of cash flow off this property is the only objective, you have to prepare for that.