I would be careful on how one approaches it, but in my experience you can usually use the lack of credit history as a basis to justify co-signing.

I use a combination of the two.The title of this thread betrays a wrong approach to this, however.

yeah I just talked to someone else at the water department first he wasn't sure then he went and asked someone else and said that I'm reponsible for the full lenth from the main pipe on the street to the curb stop and from curb stop to the house, should I be taking this to court because all the contractors I have brought are saying that they only do it from the curb stop to the house but not to the street because its the city that should do it.

I do think that some of his ideas would be dificult to do -- may be more theoretical than real, but still worth reading.A great stimulus and customer-focused approach.

Any ideas on what can I do to approach that.

It's really funny how different counties take different approaches; Travis County (Austin, which probably has the highest per sq. ft residential) quit getting it from the MLS a few years ago.

Granted this is easier changed than exterior lines, but can be expensive.I think we're probably approaching a "sea change" in utility consumption in the house.

If these people are approaching me to do their site, then I tell them to come back when they've solidified the site's purpose*.

After the class a student approached me and said that she is so frustrated with this whole real estate game because she is so overwhelmed with the process that she doesn't know where to start, or what she should be doing day by day.

what is the best approach for a newbie sub to, lease option or the traditional home or apartment borrowing?