I've recently gutted 2 and it never occurred to be to get rid of the tub as a way of steering away from the large families that destroy apartments.

I think the 1% and 2% rules are destroyed out there.

So, after the eviction, I plan on taking them to court for all the back rent, and anything they have destroyed.  

The children often would make it a game of purposely destroying the beautiful streetlamps and the sidewalks and the yards.

Not a huge deal over a handful of units, but who is going to collect from the other owners and what happens when it is destroyed again.The Postal service makes the decision on cluster boxes vs individual unit delivery - has to do with the route and efficiency.

Here's an article about it.http://denverrealestateinvesting.blogspot.com/2011...Then, you'd have to prove the tenant destroyed the unit.  

Maybe it because they are destroying other people's property and not theirs?

I don't know why a few people in the area rent out houses for just slightly more than the mortgage.Anyhow, my thought process is if the parent or student has good credit, they don't want it destroyed by not paying rent or damaging the house beyond the security depositIf they pass the screenings I make each student sign the same lease and if they have a co-signer, I attach co-signer addendums for each If someone moves out, I have the new person moving in sign the lease. 

If they destroy it, evict them.Mike

Tenants have the ability to destroy your home along with your dreams if you are personally attached.