
25 August 2016 | 3 replies
Also good idea is to get a verification that they have their own workmen s comp insurance, so your not stuck if they get injured on your site, you simply ask them to have their insurance guy send you a certificate of insurance made out to you, for your address your having the work preformed at.

23 August 2016 | 4 replies
I have no idea where to start, but I am hard working and willing to do my best to make this dream a reality.

22 August 2016 | 1 reply
We're hoping that we can manage to get tenants to turn over in the summer, where we can spend a couple of weeks down in DC combining a little vacation in the place with fixing things up and finding a new tenant).Of course I made some mistakes already, too, but I think I'll get away with them this time...So after getting my feet wet, I've been reading about REI, and we do have cash / equity (our primary home is just about paid off) to stuff with, so now I'm considering to get into it in a non-accidental way, and it seems more prudent to look at our local area (NH seacost), but it turns out I have little idea about the purchase/rental market here, and it doesn't seem all that easy to find out (in NoVA, at least, there's a very active market, while here prices seem to fluctuate wildly for no obvious (to me) reason.

28 August 2016 | 6 replies
Neil Roseman from LeadProbe is a great guy to talk to and probably can give you a good idea because he knows the city so well.

11 September 2016 | 11 replies
If they only read your title post, they too may think an LLC has magic tax beans.The idea that tax benefits exist simply by having an LLC is what I was emphasizing.

31 August 2016 | 10 replies
Anyone done this before or have an idea?

25 August 2016 | 4 replies
This gave tenant good idea of what was expected for them to do as per our move-in and move- out check list.

22 September 2016 | 63 replies
@Gualter Amarelo I think meeting in the office is a great idea.
22 August 2016 | 1 reply
I understand that the rules would help you determine if the property cash flowed and that the 2% one was used first, while the 50% was used more like a final factor (in the example).What doesn't make sense is why the property was deemed a bad idea, wouldn't the fact that the 50% rule gave 0 cash flow (rather than negative) mean that the investor would still be able to make money on loan pay down?