Without getting into nuances of federal law friendly foreign service personnel are afforded the same rights as US military personnel.

For ex) After taking down some sheet rock in some of the exterior walls to run our electrical we noticed that in most of the exterior walls there was no insulation..

As an alternative you may want to look at some of the Crowd funding short term debt deals I think foreign citizens may be exempt from the accredited investor US regs..and or Look at investing in some mortgage funds here I the states..

I've got another buddy who's a manager at an insurance sales company who trades a very lucrative forex portfolio. 

Unless of course our illustrious leader has suddenly become Machiavellian after multiple foreign policy debacles and convinced the Saudis to put some pressure on the Iranians, so they will actually negotiate nuclear issues rather than to pretend that they are.  

The real reasons behind our foreign policy are explained in papers such as "A Clean Break:  A New Strategy for Securing the Realm". 

Just a few options you have to invest in are: residential and commercial real estate, undeveloped or raw land, real estate notes (mortgages and deeds of trusts), private limited partnerships (limited liability companies and C corporations), tax lien certificates, foreign currencies, and oil and gas investments to name a few.

One property In Detroit its common for the Policed to relocate the elderly or those that have lived on one of these blocks for years that has turned Ghetto. they don't have the man power or resources to protect the innocent.. so they pay to move them.Its a very sad commentary on the war zones of the us inner cities.. and the poor people that have lived in the neighborhood for 30 years or more only to see it turn and decay to an extent that the government can not protect you anymore.And then you take the lovely Flippers that buy this crap for nothing and sell it to unsuspecting out of state investors or foreign investors and the cycle of greed and is complete.

There was also the fact that the natives knew the land better than the foreigners and would constantly escape but de las casas advocated to free the native americans which happened and they decided to replace them with african americans.this move makes little sense to me since he saw the suffering of one group of people and decides to replace them with another but that's besides the point.You are also correct about the different groups of people who have come to america and made it their home, the irish, polish, germans, jews, you name it they've come but again they came of their own free will, whether it be to flee the potato famine in the mid 1700's or the jews during the world war they choose to come here.the fact that you said you don't see any representation of the immigrants or the slaves in our constitution illustrates my point exactly that the people who benefited the most from the free labor (slavery) wouldn't even state so in their constitution because it goes against everything they wanted their new country to stand for.

The French would apologize to Iran and send them some more protection money) Israel has learned the hard way not to base their foreign policy on the public opinions of foreign governments.