Some other posters have gotten burned dealing with crappy tenants and I understand their frustration with certain aspects of being a landlord, but it comes with the territory. 

But if you have evidence based on the behavior of the individual animal that it poses a danger to your property or to others, then you can disallow it.

While still permitted, CFD is dangerous in the extreme for sellers. 

FAR more than cash flow could have done by probably 20X or more.I found Charleston SC 5 years ago now.. first houses I bought were scary it was old old falling down no one wanted to live there.last house I sold last month sold for 650k .. first house I remodeled and sold there 5 years ago with 260k.. so on and so forth.. now we have pioneered it and others are in the market as well building and regentrify and its rock star territory.. 5 years ago no one wanted it.. it was the hood .. :)  Same with neighorhoods in Indy right now.. big money being made on value add.. far more than cash flow.

Putting this as an item you 'figure out' before and/or during construction is dangerous for budgets and timelines.

You’re feeling uncertainty because you are swimming in uncharted territory.

YOUR WELCOME for your life feeling free of harm and danger. 

And if so, that sounds different to me than using two agents who are in the same territory or competing space. 

I agree with what others have said.Look closely into the SEC rules about this.Also, as @Ola Dantis have pointed out, this deal is CASHFLOW-POOR and to me, that's a dangerous thing.

It had sec 8 tenants that I didn't find out about until after escrow and was a total mess with bad(some dangerous) tenants and 10+ years of deferred maintenance when i picked it up in february.