But it's still a little bit of a different thesis that using DCA as a proxy for an investment strategy.But what do I know, I'm no financial planner nor am I an economist...

Good info... but there is a reason why economist look at aggregate data when planning.

Economists estimate we're still some five years behind the demand for housing.

I woke up at 3am and read a great article about this from a Harvard economist. 

Real Estate Center Chief Economist Dr.

Personally, I believe (as do most economists) that we're towards the peak of the current economic cycle, and therefore, my belief is that any investing strategy that has a long-term liquidity horizon is going to be higher-risk and less profitable than those investing strategies that have a shorter-term liquidity horizon.In summary, right now I don't believe land development is more profitable than other strategies, such as flipping, new construction on infill lots (in areas with quick turnaround on site development and permit approvals) and buy-and-hold.

Ivy league economists with PhD's have studied this stuff.

@Mike S.This sounds like a question for experienced policy makers, economists, and business leaders that are making decisions on where to locate. 

You subscribe to Netflix, Uber,https://www.zuora.com/vision/subscription-economy/     Please visit  www.Zuora.com a worldwide company with a great website to show you the trend in worldwide business practices--it effects YOU....LOW HOUSING INVENTORY will save us from a crash:"economists believe a housing crash is unlikely because a shortage of homes coming on to the market"NOTICED?

Japan has negative interest rates, something just a few years ago economists said was impossible.