This is obviously more dangerous.

Any tree I have in my parks that has a chance to cause any danger I chop down and that was 6 in past year..

And I can call police and report her as a very dangerous trespasser who threaten my family's life and my belongs, because she will be able to access any place in my house in 24 hours.

While there are many nuances associated with this space, I know a tad bit more than enough to be dangerous and I am looking to connect with those who have interest in the space or currently operate within it.Looking forward to talking!

As an LP/investor that may not affect you from an SEC standpoint, but as a rule I do not do business with people that cut corners so dangerously, and would suggest you don't either.

You want to make sure you haven't inherited terrible / or shadily placed tenets even if there are no immediate signs of danger.

The problem here was a couple fold.1) The city was looking a higher foreclosure rate on top of a higher rate of abandoned and dangerous properties. 2) My university was looking at a housing shortage starting in a few years. 

@Jorge Pena, a dissenting opinion from a little pockets investor.Unless you are in danger of drowning financially, I would keep the property and proceed with the reno, even if it goes a little slower than you plan.  

Sounds dangerous haha.

All are in low budget neighborhoods (but not dangerous).