Similar to efforts on the project management side, all of the lessons learned on leasing were learned with pain—a lot of pain.We learned that no credit was not necessarily good credit, and that people will make up references and blatantly lie about evictions and delinquency on applications.

This is nothing short of malpractice in my eyes, this isn't like a small error...this is blatant not-understanding of the law and it's application. 

None of which is true, the guest never offered any evidence besides blatantly accusing the owner. 

Those escrow agents are saving your bacon.IMO, always learn the rules before you try playing the game - - I had to learn this too.We attended some seminars in Houston in early 20xx and got lots of information which was only partially true and some (like this and short sales) that was blatantly illegal. 

It was blatant BS from the get-go. 

Given they listed the only government number they had and they put it in the box that was used for government identification numbers, it's not blatant fraud.Your main question should be, how come when I used a SSN to screen and it came back with nothing, I didn't investigate further rather than "chalking it up"?

This is nothing more than a certain political party in the U.S. showing how EXTREMLY Communist they now run, how desperate they want to take CONTROL of things is, that THEY dictate who can make what, and that they don't have to actually do anything, including admit that BLATANTLY obvious that they fostered rampant inflation, no no no, just blame it on someone.     

If they really are using your land to increase the density and value of an adjacent development (even indirectly), you have a very strong argument that your parcel should be allowed that similar increased density and value as well.Unless there is a blatant reason why your property should remain under its current zoning, I would pursue the negotiations with the higher density/value in mind.

The seller blatantly lied on the seller disclosure (obvious cover up attempts were noted).

As to the opinions voiced here that any attorney can easily pierce any LLC it is blatantly not true.