Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 16 years ago, 04/13/2008

User Stats

13
Posts
0
Votes
Kelly Douglas
  • Real Estate Investor
  • South Elgin, IL
0
Votes |
13
Posts

Eminent domain - Fair compensation?

Kelly Douglas
  • Real Estate Investor
  • South Elgin, IL
Posted

This is a legitimate case of condemnation for public use.

Here is the deal. An eminent domain move by the village will reduce our site by approximately 10%. We need to determine the fair market value of the land required (10%) and the loss of value to the remaining 90%.

Questions:
1. How is the fair market value assessed? How many appraisals are typically required?

2. With the 10% percent loss in usable land, how does this affect the value of the remaining 90%? Obviously it is reduced, but how is compensation figured in this situation?

3. The adjacent developer is required to negotiate with us in good faith, before the village will condemn the land needed for public use. For the adjacent developer to break ground, they need an agreement with our company to use 10% of our land for public improvements. In this case, how is “good faith” negotiating defined? Would it be more beneficial for the adjacent developer to half heartedly negotiate with us and to just let the village condemn the land?

4. Would it be better for us to actively negotiate with the adjacent developer or let it fall into the village’s hands to be negotiated?

Thank you for your help.

Loading replies...