It has more than 95% 1 star reviews and each of them has a bad experience to tell.From the consumer's perspective, FNMA is a debt collection agency.

I'm defaulting to apartments because It's difficult to find parks on city water and sewer available in my metro, and acquiring single families is so time consuming (1 door at a time). 

I can't stress how important it is to start consuming as much reading/podcasts/youtube vids/etc as you can, especially in whatever niche you're going to focus on. 

Darrin Brunner seems like isocket3g requires the consumer to provide the SIM card and in most cases, this is where they would have to pay a monthly fee to the carrier for the service.Good to have that option though.

It's the landlords job to review/interpret it.Here are a few of the sources that I checked on the matter:Massachusetts Office of Consumer Affairs & Business Regulation: http://www.mass.gov/ocabr/consumer/housing/tenant-and-landlord/landlord-rights.html(They actually suggest you ALWAYS run a credit check on any potential tenants.)Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General's Guide to Landlord/Tenant Rights:http://www.mass.gov/ago/docs/consumer/landlordtenant073007.pdfMassachusetts Legal Help (.org) publication on Tenant Screening:http://www.masslegalhelp.org/housing/finding-public-and-subsidized-housing/tenant-screening.pdfSo, if there is such a law, I'd also be interested in seeing it.

Quiet title is a suit against all claims, a civil action taken based on the circumstances with fewer statutory hills to climb.

I recently did almost the same repair on one of my rentals, and it's not that hard or time consuming.

Hey Spencer, I'm not an expert on the topic but since you haven't received any responses yet I thought I'd throw these links out there for you to see if they help:http://www.cslb.ca.gov/consumers/knowrisksofownerbuilder/http://www.cslb.ca.gov/BuildingOfficials/OwnerBuilderOverview.asphttp://articles.latimes.com/1991-04-14/realestate/re-503_1_contractor-licensing-laws-licensing-exemption

"I have heard of this being done to someone, however, I think she may have been fooled and did not look into her rights as a tenant.I mean, if that was the case, why would there be evictions, as they are costly and time consuming (so I hear).Is this type of clause in your lease completely illegal?

I'm thinking that fewer properties will easier as it means fewer to manage but maybe I'm missing something because my strategy seems to be so different than most.