The remediation costs were in the six figures...There shouldn’t be anything illegal about doing work to the other party’s property with their consent.

It was always my understanding that the investor goes on title (as your debt to income will be too high to do so after doing this a few times) and then you would have a lawyer do up a 3rd party contract stating you own the property and the proceeds 50/50 with the investorIs there someone out there, Maybe a lender, who might be able to clarify this for me?

They were served in February, were supposed to be out by April and stayed.The worst part is that this is not my property.

Personally, I am not a big fan of third party payers (Section 8, insurance companies, etc) but it is a niche plenty of people occupy successfully.

Basically either party can end the contract with a 30 day notice.

And hear you all loud and clear on the attorney part. I

All countries are driving their currencies down since it's a short-term fix for a lot of problems for them.As far as govt being a responsible party managing fiscal policy - You've got to be kidding.

However, to do a cash out on an investment property, she can't go lower than 75% LTV, which would be $104k, that part is fine, but the rate would be 4.375%. 

I am wondering if I should try to use the sellers agent so that there is more incentive for the agent hoping that he or she could help out both parties?

As parameters are filtered down to the local team and (likely) some third party broker...they don't have as much flexibility in negotiations.