A question I have been pondering within myself for some time and figured here would be a good place to get an answer.I currently own a home that has close to 100k in equity in it, we plan to move in 3-5 years to our long term house and would be sizing up a fair amount.So my question is should I use the equity to fund investments/projects, or should I save it and roll it all into my next house so I can have it paid off sooner/lower my monthly.

It's still relatively under-the-radar and obliterating the Ohio markets in terms of appreciation.

He smiles and said okay, "but that's a long list."  

Things will get “complicated” if you try to buy more than 3 replacement properties.I don’t see a problem with her renting you a space in her commercial building as long as she charges you “fair market rent”  (then she could leave the property to you at her passing.)

Additionally, it can help maximize renovations and improvements.A Cost Segregation study is an IRS approved federal income tax tool that increases near term cash flow by utilizing shorter recovery periods for depreciation to accelerate return on investment.

I've done over 75 flips in the past 3 years, we manage 300+ doors, and I own 28 long term rentals. 

I own a two long term rental in the Pacific Northwest and one in the Midwest.

If you want to avoid the lengthy process of securing permits and navigating ordinances, you can always opt for long-term rental for the first year.

The other advantage the California investors have is that their equity goes a long way in another area.  

Matt, any strategy can be smart or a good idea as long as you understand and are ok with the risks.Going out of state is higher risk than staying in your local market.