You will probably need cooperation from the PM to find this out and get the information to make a report for fraud, and the police may not do anything beyond taking the police report, but if your original tenant was a scammer, they are going to scam again, and the police report with the scammer's name on it, even if it not prosecuted, will make it much more likely that the next time the scammer does it (and they WILL), they will be prosecuted. 2.

I bet you should be talking to who ever prosecutes that type of crime RR

Hello all in Rochester, NY who are interested in getting justice in the form of prosecution of Doug Hirt.The Asst.

I hear they have an amazing status & protection from prosecution per se.

Using a fraudulent POF is considered an attempt to commit financial fraud and you can be prosecuted if the agent contacts the authorities.

(C)ScopeSubparagraph (B) shall apply to a person procuring a consumer report on a consumer in connection with the consumer’s application for employment only if—(i)the consumer is applying for a position over which the Secretary of Transportation has the power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service pursuant to the provisions of section 31502 of title 49, or a position subject to safety regulation by a State transportation agency; and(ii)as of the time at which the person procures the report or causes the report to be procured the only interaction between the consumer and the person in connection with that employment application has been by mail, telephone, computer, or other similar means.(4)Exception for national security investigations(A)In generalIn the case of an agency or department of the United States Government which seeks to obtain and use a consumer report for employment purposes, paragraph (3) shall not apply to any adverse action by such agency or department which is based in part on such consumer report, if the head of such agency or department makes a written finding that—(i)the consumer report is relevant to a national security investigation of such agency or department;(ii)the investigation is within the jurisdiction of such agency or department;(iii)there is reason to believe that compliance with paragraph (3) will—(I)endanger the life or physical safety of any person;(II)result in flight from prosecution;(III)result in the destruction of, or tampering with, evidence relevant to the investigation;(IV)result in the intimidation of a potential witness relevant to the investigation;(V)result in the compromise of classified information; or(VI)otherwise seriously jeopardize or unduly delay the investigation or another official proceeding.

It seems it would open you up to lawsuits by your buyers and prosecution by the local authorities.

runs the risk of Federal prosecution for illegal discrimination.My $0.02 ...

On the burden of proof in a summary judgment motion, see §22.2A.Summary judgements are next to impossible to win and very expensive to prosecute. 

There are solutions, but the city would rather watch these poor souls die slowly rather than go back to prosecuting crimes.So many addicts get help and get clean once they are given a choice of jail or diversion to get clean.