That's not to say there isn't a very specific definition of ROI, but what ROI is telling you may not be exactly what you want to know.There are lots of specific return metrics -- cash-on-cash, IRR, return on equity, etc -- that can be used to evaluate the financial performance of a deal, and it's up to you to determine what metrics you care about and what you're trying to optimize for.I would recommend getting familiar with several different performance metrics, figure out what information each is conveying about the performance of the property, and then use the one(s) that are providing the information you really care about.

Those contracts show up and are expensed as performed in small operations, temp work can skew reality.I'll stick to my initial impression.

. , I've used ValueGuard in Philadelphia to perform a house inspection on my main triplex.

@Trevor Lohman, I do buy 1st non performing notes in California.

The rules are there to give you an idea of what might happen and how the property may perform, then you run your in depth analysis.

My biggest question is who would want a non-performing member on their "staff"?

This way there's no cash out of his pocket that he was counting on receiving.It's important to keep in mind that he has/will probably perform a service or go above the scope of work without charging for it, such as when an unforeseen issue arises during a repair or when he shows up and takes care of something promptly on very short notice.

I have a feeling you've seen this link before, but if not, this is a "dynamic" chart that shows how the S&P performs next to a constantly changing "dynamic" yield curve over the years.

I'm a little confused about the term "subject to" when it comes to non performing 2nd mortgage workouts.I've been learning about various workout scenarios possible with non performing 2nd mortgage's and I see you can indeed forclose on the borrower from the 2nd position, subject to the 1st mortgagage.

Did you have a quiet title action performed?