
21 April 2014 | 13 replies
If the repairs are immediate they would need to come off of the sales price so likely looking at an 8 cap at current purchase price.When tenants do not pay utility they consume 30% more on average.

4 May 2014 | 21 replies
If you were mislead you can still call them out on it and if they want to play hardball you can sue them under the consumer protection law, MGL 93A.

10 March 2015 | 10 replies
I called the city, the district court, consumer housing, every department out there and no one can answer me.

4 June 2014 | 46 replies
(Most is free or low cost, just time consuming)2) You need MONEY to start.

3 May 2014 | 2 replies
Is this possible and how hard, time consuming, and what would it cost?

13 May 2014 | 12 replies
If the exterior paint truly has alligated to the point that it needs to be completely physically removed... that's a very involved process that requires a lot of hand labor and some specialized tools - ESPECIALLY if you're going to do the project in compliance with EPA regulations.This process is, in fact, so time-and-labor consuming that it can be a heckuva lot cheaper to simply remove the exterior siding and re-clad with new siding.Unless there's some specific reason (historic siding, for example) that makes you want to retain the old siding... alligated paint is just a bear of a job.And just to help the matter, here's a good image of alligated paint -http://www.benjaminmoore.com/en-us/for-your-home/alligatoring

27 January 2013 | 24 replies
I did some research on them cause their prices seemed reasonable ....I found a bunch of complaints against them on the following websites Ripoff Report and the Consumer Complaint Board....it seems that most of the complaints were due to title issues and liens that were never removed.

23 February 2016 | 19 replies
Josh, Myself personally, I am a big fan of hiring great people to do the SEO work, far too time consuming.

26 September 2011 | 18 replies
But, doing 20-30 rehabs per year can be expensive and time-consuming.

26 September 2011 | 0 replies
.), generally bringing in a total of something around $2T/year as a near-term historic averageNow play with the rest of the data at will -the answers won't be mood-enhancing, but they'll sure be enlightening.PS: "THEY" ALL KNOW THIS - every single "guru" making statements without a shred of basis knows this and many other absolute facts of the current debacle and the folly of any level of taxation as its cure.the problem's quite clear, the answer is even more clear - SPENDING is the problem.