Innovative Strategies
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 13 years ago on . Most recent reply
Why Rent when you can Rehab?
Hello, I'm sure many people here are a big fan of renting properties to obtain wealth and so was I. But, thinking through this more clearly, I realized it would take so much longer to obtain money by renting out houses. Put it this way, lets say you have one rental and bought it for 50k. Now lets say you put in 15k to rehab and plan on renting it for 1,200 a month gross. It would literally take over a decade just to get your money back on the rehab costs only. Now think about a rehab. Lets say you bought it for 50k, put in 30k and resold it for $130. Net profit is 30k in 3-4 months. Anyone is a big imbalance here? I have no idea why anyone would want to rent to see a return on their money years down the road when you could see a return within months. Many will say because Rehabs require a lot of work, but it really doesn't because once systems are in place you can get a project done with under 10 hours a week. That's pretty good in my book. Any opinions?
Most Popular Reply

Greg, I think this is a good question. I also feel I am in a good position to answer it as I am both a landlord and buy-sell guy.
I have some comments:
First of all, I don't know how realistic your numbers are. 80k total cost into 130k resale is 61.5%. That is a very hard number to reach consistently. But for sake of doing an analysis we can use it.
So let's say, 30k profit. You have to pay short-term tax on that. Let's say your effective rate is 40%. So 12,000 goes to taxes. You really only end up with 18,000.
If you get 1,200/month rent and assume it is free and clear. Let's say you self manage it and we will use the 50% rule, less 10% for management. $720/month in cash-flow. Let's say the improvements are valued at 75% of the total cost. 65,000 * 75% / 27.5 years you can depreciate sfh = 1,772 / 12 months = $147/month of depreciation.
$573 * 12 months = $6,876 * 60% factor in taxes = $4,125 after tax
$142 * 12 months = $1,704 depreciation add-back, tax free
After tax benefit 5,829
So it would take just over 3 years to make as much renting it as flipping it.
But you still own the house! So let's say after 3 years you decide to sell the property. Assuming the value is the same...
You would make 30,000 again but it would be taxes at the long-term capital gains tax rate (which is 15%).
$30,000 * 85% = $25,500 + 17,487 (5,829 over 3 years) = 42,987 after taxes.
If you can add leverage to the rental property the situation it is a lot better.
The buy-sell business is a job that is great for returning a huge ROI that is highly taxes (contains very few of the benefits of real estate ownership).
Thinking of the end business model I would rather own 10 of the houses free and clear and make 60k after taxes for managing them then have to flip 3 a year for the rest of my life.
I am doing both. But I think landlording makes sense if you understand it in the terms above. Especially if you can buy properties at 1/2 or 1/3 of replacement cost. If they ever need to build a house again I would imagine we are going to see prices go up.