
16 January 2008 | 13 replies
I'm currently trying a short sale, just got off the phone with the seller after having met her this weekend, authorize to release info is filed with the lender so hoping they get out their short sale package soon.

28 October 2007 | 25 replies
They never even open the package.

1 December 2007 | 6 replies
That may have been a mistake; they perhaps should have done the standard screw-the-landlord procedure and kept the last month against the security deposit, but they were naive and assumed it would be returned...

8 August 2007 | 2 replies
Accordingly, property management activities that require a real estate license include: showing a unit for sale or lease, negotiating lease or real estate contract terms, maintaining security deposits, rent payments or earnest money deposits.Still searching for Missouri information.

10 August 2007 | 5 replies
The problem is tha every "builder's" contract I've ever seen was so one sided with out clauses for the seller that it may be tough.Lesson, if a deal cannot be secured for $1,000 or less, walk/run away.all cash

13 August 2007 | 6 replies
I'm with Mike---if you are going to put up a sizeable earnest deposit, make sure that your ducks are in a row first (i.e. financing)---if the REO bank does except your low ball offer, it will most likely be without the contigency to secure financing (in other words, can't finance it, thanks for the 10K).

3 September 2007 | 5 replies
He then tried to get me sold on the idea of buying 10 houses in a package deal for 570k that have a monthly rents of $6200.

11 August 2007 | 9 replies
can someone please clarify exactly how to secure a property with my name on the title that i am investing in--i am providing the capital for rehab, we have a contract for sale to end buyer--i want to collateralize my capital with the property--there are no other liens on it-- how do i do this?

22 August 2007 | 15 replies
My goal is to secure a listing on the property.

7 January 2008 | 19 replies
the challenge seems to be in finding an escrow/title company that will allow the "double escrow" to be done.....for example: there is an escrow open that is required by the lender once the "approval" from the lender is secured....then there needs to be another escrow opened between the "buyer" and the "end-buyer" on the same property....so, "end buyer" comes into escrow with the $300K plus closing costs, closes existing escrow on the property...then the title/escrow officer walks into the next room and applies the $250K plus closing costs to the original escrow to close that one.in theory and once in the past this was the way it was and still should be...but, now as it seems, most escrow/title companies are not wanting to do the "double" escrow for reasons of "full disclosure" to all parties, for fear of not being "sued" for some type of fraud.those of us not engaging in these tactics get penalized.....but, such is life....i have a title company that has stated they will do a "double" escrow but, will need to let the lender know this fact. not disclose the "amount" the "end-buyer" is paying, merely disclose there is a 'double" escrow in effect....well, obviously this should kill the deal right at the very end....so, not a wise direction to take....